I got a fetus, and I know how to use it
(see news story below or at link at top)
I have a problem with this on so many different levels. I appreciate the "good intentions" behind it... but I think this is a long wrong road they are trying to travel.
Ignoring the feminist rants against this, my reasons for not liking it include:
1. The lawmaker cited "We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think about having an abortion..." How about the incentive of sparing a life... if she is going to think nothing of killing her own child, she should think nothing of giving it away to someone who will take care of it.
2. Many poor women do not have to pay for having a baby due to medicaid, and they get WIC as they get close to term... $500 might seem tempting. I don't like the idea of creating a baby market... that's why there are laws against selling babies for adoption.
3. It will be $500 today, and then (as time curries favor) the price will begin to rise... as "$500 will not be enough for what the poor mother has to endure to bring that child to the world". The coercive ultimatum will be "raise the amount, or they'll abort".
...can I get a receipt for that?
From: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,260741,00.html
Texas State Lawmaker Wants to Pay Women $500 to Choose Adoption Over Abortion
Friday, March 23, 2007
AUSTIN, Texas — A proposal by state Sen. Dan Patrick would pay pregnant women $500 for choosing adoption over abortion.
The anti-abortion Houston Republican said Senate Bill 1567 would provide an incentive to forgo abortion, but critics questioned whether such payments would be viewed as baby selling or coercion.
"We want that lady to have an incentive that makes her stop and think about having an abortion and that gives her a reason to put her baby up for adoption," Patrick said. "My goal is to save as many babies as we possibly can."
Critics of the bill, which has not yet been scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, said the idea of paying women to choose adoption oversimplifies the decision they face.
"This is insulting to women and also insulting to all the great charitable organizations out there that do wonderful work finding adoptive parents and taking care of the birth mother," said Fran Hagerty of the Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas.
Joe Pojman of the anti-abortion group Texas Alliance for Life also expressed caution.
"We just need to make sure there isn't even the perception of baby buying going on," Pojman said.
It's against Texas law to offer to give a thing of value to another for acquiring a child for purposes of adoption.
Patrick disputed any portrayal of the bill as baby selling.
"We're just giving someone an incentive to put your baby up for adoption," he said. "Then the baby goes through the normal adoptive process."
Adam Pertman, head of the adoption-policy group Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, said women facing adoption need to be able to weigh all options equally.
"You let women respectfully make the best decision they can at an excruciatingly difficult time. Introducing money into the mix can be coercive," Pertman said.


